Resources
High-trust sectors are not resisting AI or change. They are trying to move faster than their operational foundations allow. The gap is not confidence. It is the evidence underneath it.
The Confidence Gap
Most organisations believe they could operate through a major technology incident. Far fewer can show the evidence behind that belief.
We asked organisations across financial services, legal and professional services, and the not-for-profit sector how ready they really are for technology disruption and AI. The early findings point to a pattern: confidence runs high, but the proof behind it is inconsistent. Organisations trust they could keep running through a major incident, yet most have not tested that assumption, or cannot evidence it if someone asks.
High-trust sectors are not resisting AI or change. They are trying to move faster than their operational foundations allow.
Read the preview
* Results are interim based on 370 responses. The full report, with 400+ responses, follows in late November.
What the early research covers:
- The confidence-to-proof gap, measured across resilience, recovery and AI readiness
- How the pressure changes by sector
- Where AI ambition is running ahead of governance, and what that exposes
- What provable readiness looks like, rather than assumed readiness
Get the full report, and a seat at the table
The complete study lands in November: 400+ responses, deeper sector analysis and the practical steps organisations are taking to close the gap. Register and we’ll send it as soon as it’s released. You’ll also get first access to our sector roundtables, where we’ll work through the findings with people facing the same pressures as you.
Question?
Our specialists have the answer